Defense manufacturers and developers
The goal is to protect intellectual property, development documentation and engineering systems from espionage-style, targeted attacks.
/ DEFENSE INDUSTRY
In the defense industry, cybersecurity is a matter of contractual eligibility and national interest. Security testing shows whether your sensitive data, engineering environments and supply chain can stand up to a targeted, persistent adversary.
[ 01 ] / WHAT IT IS
The purpose of defense industry security testing is to show that a defense-sector organization's sensitive, restricted-access and intellectual-property data, development environments and systems are protected against targeted, persistent (APT-style) adversaries, and that the organization meets customer and regulatory security requirements.
The defense industry is a prime target: sensitive technical data, development documentation, intellectual property and customer information attract even state-level actors. The threat is targeted and persistent, and often arrives through the supply chain, starting with smaller partners. So the aim of testing is not just to find the usual vulnerabilities, but to establish whether the organization can withstand a well-resourced, patient adversary.
The regulatory and contractual setting is demanding: national and EU rules, the security requirements of customers (including government and foreign partners), the rules for handling classified and restricted information, and frameworks such as ISO 27001 or NIST SP 800-171, which US customers and CMMC often expect. Testing provides evidence that controls work in practice.
Defense industry testing frequently extends to embedded and industrial systems, engineering and development environments, the review of air-gapped networks and their gateways, and supply-chain risk. The methodology builds on penetration testing and red teaming, within stricter confidentiality and access frameworks. We carry out only defensive, authorized testing of an organization's own systems.
Regulation and frameworks
[ 02 ] / WHO IT'S FOR
In the defense sector the purpose differs by role, but the common thread is protecting sensitive data and trust.
The goal is to protect intellectual property, development documentation and engineering systems from espionage-style, targeted attacks.
The goal is to evidence compliance with customer security requirements. Weak links in the supply chain are a favorite way in for attackers, so customers increasingly ask for proof.
The goal is early verification of the security of embedded software, communications and control systems during development.
The goal is to check access rights, remote access and data handling, as these providers often have broader access than their own protection justifies.
The goal is practical evidence of meeting customer expectations (such as NIST SP 800-171) at a manageable cost, with a risk-based scope.
The goal is an independent, evidence-based view of whether controls work in practice, for leadership and customers.
[ 03 ] / WHAT'S INCLUDED
We define the scope and the method individually, after first agreeing the confidentiality and access conditions.
We model the methods (TTPs) of persistent, well-resourced attackers and identify the organization's most valuable data and systems.
We test from the internet and from inside the network, with particular attention to paths that lead to critical data.
An objective-driven, realistic attack simulation that tests whether your defenses detect and stop the adversary. See red teaming.
We examine the protection of source repositories, CI/CD, engineering workstations and document management systems.
Security assessment of control and embedded systems built into products and production, with product and plant safety in mind.
We check isolated and restricted-access networks, their gateways and the handling of removable media.
We assess the risk from supplier and service-provider access, software dependencies and external connections.
We check how sensitive data is stored, transferred and access-controlled, and look for exfiltration paths.
[ 04 ] / HOW IT WORKS
The first step is to fix the confidentiality and access framework. Sensitive data is always handled under the customer's rules.
We sign a nondisclosure agreement and agree in advance the access rules, where and how work is done, and who may carry out the testing. Any special conditions for classified environments are clarified with the customer.
We identify the most valuable data and systems and build a scenario around the relevant attacker methods.
We run penetration tests or the red team simulation in a controlled, agreed way, keeping plant and product safety in mind.
Findings are documented with evidence, handling and storing as little sensitive data as possible.
You receive executive and technical reports, handled where required under your customer's marking rules, with fix recommendations and a timetable.
After fixes we verify the result, then delete or hand over the engagement data under the agreed rules.
[ 05 ] / WHAT IT SOLVES
In the defense industry, a successful attack does not just cost money: customer trust, contracts and intellectual property can be lost, and strategic harm can follow. Testing shows where a persistent attacker could get through, and where they would reach valuable data, before it happens.
It also serves as evidence for customers, authorities and auditors that your controls work in practice, which is increasingly a precondition for winning and keeping contracts.
[ 06 ] / WHY QYNTAR
Because defense testing demands both trust and an adversary's mindset for targeted attacks.
We do not tick off a standards checklist. We examine how a persistent, well-resourced adversary would actually reach the target.
We set confidentiality, access rules and the handling of sensitive data at the start of the engagement, and keep to them throughout.
We carry out only authorized testing that protects an organization's own systems.
IT, embedded and industrial systems and compliance support from a single partner. See compliance support.
[ 07 ] / FAQ
To show that sensitive data, development environments and systems are protected against targeted, persistent adversaries, and that the organization meets customer and regulatory security requirements.
Before the engagement we sign a nondisclosure agreement and agree the access and data-handling rules. We handle, store and delete engagement data in the agreed manner, and process the minimum necessary.
In environments that handle classified information, the conditions of work (security clearance, location, equipment) are subject to separate rules, which must be settled with the customer and the competent bodies before the engagement. We decide whether to accept such work after that discussion.
NIST SP 800-171 is the US requirement set for protecting controlled unclassified information, expected of suppliers on US defense contracts. CMMC is the related certification program. Testing helps evidence that controls work in practice.
Yes. Supplier and service-provider access, software dependencies and external connections are often the greatest risk, so they can be part of the scope.
We test under rules, windows and stop conditions agreed in advance. For systems sensitive to plant or product safety we are especially careful, and work in a lab or test environment where needed.
From a few weeks to several months depending on scope and method, and red team style engagements run longer. Agreeing the confidentiality and access framework can also take time. We give a schedule after scoping.
[ 08 ] / RELATED SERVICES
From a specific technical issue to a complex security project, we can help you find the way forward.